veronicavee
|
Michael J Fox? Reply #22341. Apr 09 18, 6:03 PM |
ClaudiaCat
|
No none of them and I would probably say not as well known Reply #22342. Apr 09 18, 7:16 PM |
Mommakat
|
Michael Adamswhaite? (may not have spelled that correctly) Reply #22343. Apr 09 18, 11:31 PM |
malama
|
Is he known more for supporting roles? Was he acting on stage, maybe on Broadway? Reply #22344. Apr 10 18, 1:07 AM |
veronicavee
|
Ryan Reynolds? Reply #22345. Apr 10 18, 5:03 AM |
ClaudiaCat
|
None of those has done a lot of things but more know for a TV series Reply #22346. Apr 10 18, 8:44 AM |
veronicavee
|
Howie Mandel? Reply #22347. Apr 10 18, 8:50 AM |
ClaudiaCat
|
No TV Show more a drama and set in Canada. Reply #22348. Apr 10 18, 9:12 AM |
Mommakat
|
Yannick Bisson? Reply #22349. Apr 10 18, 9:14 AM |
veronicavee
|
Nicholas Campbell? Reply #22350. Apr 10 18, 11:11 AM |
ClaudiaCat
|
Mommakat - you got it right - over to you. Reply #22351. Apr 10 18, 2:31 PM |
Mommakat
|
Thanks CC.....his TV series, The Murdoch Mysteries looks as if it could be good but unfortunately being profoundly deaf I cannot watch it as either the TV station or the Show's producers are too chintzy to provide Captions. Well on to another subject, this time a completely different field of endeavour....we are looking for a famous English Scientist. Reply #22352. Apr 10 18, 8:20 PM |
C30
|
Sir Isaac Newton? Reply #22353. Apr 11 18, 12:26 AM |
Mommakat
|
No, he was born almost a couple of centuries after Newton and his fame is in a different direction. Reply #22354. Apr 11 18, 12:34 AM |
C30
|
Charles Babbage? Reply #22355. Apr 11 18, 1:20 AM |
malama
|
William Thomson, 1st Baron of Kelvin? Reply #22356. Apr 11 18, 2:14 AM |
Mommakat
|
No sorry neither of those. Reply #22357. Apr 11 18, 2:26 AM |
C30
|
Still "Charles""...........Charles Darwin? Reply #22358. Apr 11 18, 4:05 AM |
malama
|
To clarify: does "his fame was in a different direction" mean a different scientific field than Newton's (physics, laws of motion, law of gravitation) or does it mean he was famous not for science, but for something else? Reply #22359. Apr 11 18, 4:24 AM |
veronicavee
|
Michael Faraday? Reply #22360. Apr 11 18, 4:41 AM |
|